WHERE
Where do Michael Rulli's campaign contributions come from?
Funding summary
- Total raised
- $1.2M
- Total spent
- $1.1M
- Cash on hand
- $71K
Where the money came from
- Individual donors$595K(52%)
- PACs$445K(39%)
- Political parties$0(0%)
- Self-funding$0(0%)
- Other receipts$114K(10%)
Top industries
Of $103K in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.
- Energy & Natural Resources$26K
- Construction & Building$16K
- Advocacy & Nonprofits$13K
- Finance & Real Estate$13K
- Technology & Media$12K
An additional $434Kin itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.
Vote-finance correlation
Data through Jul 2026 · Sources: 2 — FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [150]
Michael Rulli voted on 150 bills. He received $1,441,191.93 in donations. There is a strong negative pattern between donation amounts and yea rates. This means that as donation amounts from a sector increased, his yea rate for bills from that sector tended to decrease. He voted yes on 100% of construction bills. He voted yes on 89.5% of finance, insurance, and real estate bills. He voted yes on 85.7% of energy and natural resources bills. He voted yes on 80.0% of health bills. He voted yes on 71.4% of ideology/single-issue bills.
Fewer than 5 other members of the OH House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.
This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.
Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals reflect the current two-year cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology