Skip to main content

WHERE

Where do Danny Davis's campaign contributions come from?

Funding summary

Total raised
$948K
Total spent
$1.0M
Cash on hand
$135K

Where the money came from

  • Individual donors$416K(44%)
  • PACs$487K(51%)
  • Political parties$0(0%)
  • Self-funding$0(0%)
  • Other receipts$46K(5%)

Top industries

Of $40K in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.

  • Healthcare$8K
  • Government$7K
  • Transportation$7K
  • General Business$5K
  • Construction & Building$4K

An additional $218Kin itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.

PATTERN

Vote-finance correlation

High confidence

Data through Sep 2026 · Sources: 2FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [158]

This analysis covers 158 votes and $102,219.43 in donations for Danny Davis. There is a weak positive pattern between donation amounts and yea rates. This means larger donations were slightly more often associated with voting yes. The largest donation sector was "Other" at $62,615.14. This sector had a 50.0% yea rate on 12 bills. The "Finance/Insurance/Real Estate" sector had the most bills voted on, with 54 bills. This sector had $2,000 in donations and a 44.4% yea rate.

Fewer than 5 other members of the IL House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.

This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.

Full methodology and academic citations

Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals reflect the current two-year cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology

Related questions