Skip to main content

WHERE

Where do Gregorio Casar's campaign contributions come from?

Funding summary

Total raised
$1.1M
Total spent
$908K
Cash on hand
$371K

Where the money came from

  • Individual donors$680K(61%)
  • PACs$432K(39%)
  • Political parties$0(0%)
  • Self-funding$0(0%)

Top industries

Of $116K in itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. This is only a slice of total fundraising — PACs, parties, small-dollar donors, and self-funding are not included here.

  • General Business$30K
  • Legal & Lobbying$28K
  • Advocacy & Nonprofits$25K
  • Technology & Media$11K
  • Government$7K

An additional $354Kin itemized donations couldn't be classified — either the donor left the employer field blank or listed “retired”/“self-employed,” or the employer didn't match a known industry.

PATTERN

Vote-finance correlation

High confidence

Data through Sep 2026 · Sources: 2FEC individual filings (2026 cycle), Congress.gov roll calls (119th Congress) [168]

Gregorio Casar voted on 168 bills. He received $823,050 in donations. There is a negligible pattern between donation amounts and his voting record. This means donations did not strongly influence his votes. Casar voted on 42 bills related to Defense. He voted yea on 52.4% of these. He received $30,000 from this sector. Casar voted on 22 bills related to Energy/Natural Resources. He voted yea on 18.2% of these. He received $10,500 from this sector.

Fewer than 5 other members of the TX House delegation have comparable data right now, so no peer comparison is shown.

This analysis shows factual patterns in public data. Campaign contributions are legal and do not indicate wrongdoing. Voting alignment with donor industries is common across all legislators. Correlation does not indicate causation or improper behavior.

Full methodology and academic citations

Campaign finance data from FEC.gov. Totals reflect the current two-year cycle. Industry breakdown covers only itemized individual donations where the donor listed an employer. Full methodology

Related questions